Skip to main content
Every good theory needs to make accurate predictions. As such, I predict the following.

1. If you take the full gamut of embryologic TSA's (tissue specific antigens) and, either alone or attached to some mobile substrate, put them in contact with cancer cells, you will cause the reprogramming of the cancer cell's genomic expressions.

2. There is a particular sequence of TSA's that will take any given cancer cell to normalcy.

3. The particular sequence could be individual specific for, if you had them species-wide, it would be easy for a parasite to mimic them and avoid detection by immune cells. Instead, parasites normally continuously express a wide range of antigens throughout their life.

4. Cancer could be induced by denaturing the TSA's continuously.

5. The rate of cancer is directly proportional to the rate of cell division because this allows for a greater probability for the TSA's to become denatured.

6. Putting cancer cells into an embryo will result in the cancer cells return to normalcy. [this has already been shown by a female biologist several decades ago.]

7. #6 will only work for inbred individuals.

8. Changes that orchestrate cancer can take place via chemical, radiologic, or genomic changes that affect the TSA.

9. Genetic changes that now result in cancer, may, eventually result in new tissues (evolution).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

This article was recently published in PLOS. This is a great scientific publishing medium that doesn't charge anyone a cent to read their stuff, unlike Science and Nature and the others that hoard their publications at the expense of humanity. Anyway, the article points out that a boy being treated with stem cells for a rare genetic condition developed tumors of the brain and spinal cord. These results should come as no surprise for readers of this blog. The cells injected into the nerve tissues were allografts--they were obtained from a source other than the patients own tissues. These clearly will not be at home in another person's body and they will begin to express embryonic Cell Recognition Factors in the hope that they could establish communication. As we have learned here, a cell must know exactly where it is. Such communication must exist. If it does not, it would mean that A) any manner of invader could easily make its home in another multicellular organism, or B) any...

What about the unattached cell?

While this procedure is not what I had in mind when I spoke of being able to reprogram the cancer cell, I'm nevertheless glad that reprogramming was found to be possible for the unattached cancer cell. The unattached immune cell is needed everywhere in the body and it would make sense for a cancer derived from an immune cell to differentiate into other immune cells as needed. This is what was found by the Stanford researchers--reprogramming of leukemia cells into normal granulocytes and macrophages via supplied ligands or transcription factors. The initial observation from Stanford came about as a result of a shotgun approach. This approach should also be used for the solid tumor and if their cocktail doesn't do it, I would consider extracting Embryonic Cell Surface molecules from various developmental time points. Finding the right CRF for the differentiation of  solid tumors is right around the corner. My next post will be one showing what the CRF theory helps explain wh...

Biological Pathways Symbology