Skip to main content
Every good theory needs to make accurate predictions. As such, I predict the following.

1. If you take the full gamut of embryologic TSA's (tissue specific antigens) and, either alone or attached to some mobile substrate, put them in contact with cancer cells, you will cause the reprogramming of the cancer cell's genomic expressions.

2. There is a particular sequence of TSA's that will take any given cancer cell to normalcy.

3. The particular sequence could be individual specific for, if you had them species-wide, it would be easy for a parasite to mimic them and avoid detection by immune cells. Instead, parasites normally continuously express a wide range of antigens throughout their life.

4. Cancer could be induced by denaturing the TSA's continuously.

5. The rate of cancer is directly proportional to the rate of cell division because this allows for a greater probability for the TSA's to become denatured.

6. Putting cancer cells into an embryo will result in the cancer cells return to normalcy. [this has already been shown by a female biologist several decades ago.]

7. #6 will only work for inbred individuals.

8. Changes that orchestrate cancer can take place via chemical, radiologic, or genomic changes that affect the TSA.

9. Genetic changes that now result in cancer, may, eventually result in new tissues (evolution).

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Biological Pathways Symbology

Mutations

This post is based on speculation. It is an attempt at explaining the prevalence of mutations in cancer and their role in perpetuating the cancerous state. The transcriptome of a cell may be classified into two sets: embryonic and adult. There are, of course, conserved elements that form a union of these sets but we are more interested in the embryonic transcriptome exclusive of the union. We now consider the two Nucleotide Excision Repair (NER) mechanisms that have been studied to date: Global Genomic Repair (GGR) and transcription-coupled repair (TCR). Atanassov, et.al. A mutation can take place at or near an adult transcriptome and it is usually repaired by TCR. However, if a mutation takes place at an embryonic transcriptome during the adult stage , TCR can not repair it and, because it is in the adult, GGR may not be able to effect repairs. According to Lans et.al., "Intriguingly, in juvenile and adult animals TCR is the major NER pathway involved in the UV response. Analysi...

What about the unattached cell?

While this procedure is not what I had in mind when I spoke of being able to reprogram the cancer cell, I'm nevertheless glad that reprogramming was found to be possible for the unattached cancer cell. The unattached immune cell is needed everywhere in the body and it would make sense for a cancer derived from an immune cell to differentiate into other immune cells as needed. This is what was found by the Stanford researchers--reprogramming of leukemia cells into normal granulocytes and macrophages via supplied ligands or transcription factors. The initial observation from Stanford came about as a result of a shotgun approach. This approach should also be used for the solid tumor and if their cocktail doesn't do it, I would consider extracting Embryonic Cell Surface molecules from various developmental time points. Finding the right CRF for the differentiation of  solid tumors is right around the corner. My next post will be one showing what the CRF theory helps explain wh...