Skip to main content
I recently finished Robert Weinstein's book on "The Biology of Cancer." Whew, what a tome! I'll addresss the book in more detail later but, for now, the take away is this:

  • Cancer is mostly a disease of old age.
  • We all have it or will eventually get it. Perhaps not die from it; but autopsy will show evidence.
  • Most of us end up with slowly growing primary tumors.
  • Cancer is caused by viruses, radiation, chemicals, & mutations.
  • The best possible cure is chemical and--barring any exciting new discoveries--is multifaceted.
  • The FDA doesn't like multi-drug therapies
  • Big Pharm doesn't like it either unless they hold all the patents. If you have a rare cancer, big pharma will either not work on it or charge you a huge amount.
  • If you cured cancer today, you would only add 5 years onto a patient's life (because cancer mostly occurs in older folk.
  • Cancer behaves like a pathogen in that it keeps changing to develop "resistance" to anti-cancer drugs.
  • The characteristics of cancer include uncontrolled growth, embryonic phenotype, invasiveness, colonization.
  • Most cancer is derived from epithelial tissue: lining of digestive track, breast ducts, prostate canals?
  • One of the changes cancer undergoes is called the EMT (epithelial-mesenchymal transition) and that change is also seen in wound healing but there the cells know how to revert to normal.
This is what I remember, I may do a longer list when I go back to review and apply info to my CRF (Cell Recognition Factor) theory.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

This article was recently published in PLOS. This is a great scientific publishing medium that doesn't charge anyone a cent to read their stuff, unlike Science and Nature and the others that hoard their publications at the expense of humanity. Anyway, the article points out that a boy being treated with stem cells for a rare genetic condition developed tumors of the brain and spinal cord. These results should come as no surprise for readers of this blog. The cells injected into the nerve tissues were allografts--they were obtained from a source other than the patients own tissues. These clearly will not be at home in another person's body and they will begin to express embryonic Cell Recognition Factors in the hope that they could establish communication. As we have learned here, a cell must know exactly where it is. Such communication must exist. If it does not, it would mean that A) any manner of invader could easily make its home in another multicellular organism, or B) any...
Post a Comment
Read more

What about the unattached cell?

While this procedure is not what I had in mind when I spoke of being able to reprogram the cancer cell, I'm nevertheless glad that reprogramming was found to be possible for the unattached cancer cell. The unattached immune cell is needed everywhere in the body and it would make sense for a cancer derived from an immune cell to differentiate into other immune cells as needed. This is what was found by the Stanford researchers--reprogramming of leukemia cells into normal granulocytes and macrophages via supplied ligands or transcription factors. The initial observation from Stanford came about as a result of a shotgun approach. This approach should also be used for the solid tumor and if their cocktail doesn't do it, I would consider extracting Embryonic Cell Surface molecules from various developmental time points. Finding the right CRF for the differentiation of  solid tumors is right around the corner. My next post will be one showing what the CRF theory helps explain wh...
Post a Comment
Read more

Biological Pathways Symbology

Post a Comment
Read more