Skip to main content
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg21829224.800?cmpid=NLC|NSNS|2013-2006-GLOBAL&utm_medium=NLC&utm_source=NSNS#.UcNY-tjJjyC Naked mole rats are not prone to cancer. These animals also produce quite a bit of hyaluronan, a lubricant that helps them "glide" better through their underground tunnels. Although not mentioned by the authors, these findings support the CRF theory of cancer initiation. Apparently, if the tissues of the naked mole rats can glide past each other, you minimize tearing and cells do not lose contact with their neighbors. If a cell stays in contact with its neighbors, it has no reason to alter phenotype to that of a cancerous state. [note that hyaluronan is not exuded externally by the skin; instead, it permeates the ECM]. If the rats are engineered not to express hyaluronan, cancer then develops. However, exactly how cancer was produced in these rats was not reported. Hopefully, I'll be able to read the original work someday.

I don't know if I mentioned it elsewhere but I have noticed reports of pancreatic cancer in rough and tumble people like stunt men and others who may injure their abdominal organs to the point where tears take place and initiate cancer. The pancreas also produces many proteolytic enzymes that may result in loss of contact when injury occurs and the enzymes leak into interstitial areas. Along the same lines, children may be injuring their bones and bone marrow resulting childhood cancers.
Enhanced by Zemanta

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Biological Pathways Symbology

Tumorigenesis: Actions to initiate the cancer state. The Cell Recognition Factor theory of cancer maintains that detachment of a cell from its neighbors is necessary for most cancers to arise. After that, a malfunction or replenishment of the telomere, or a reversion to stem cell, is necessary to permit the growth of cancer cells. The immune system then comes into play in keeping cancer cells in check or in promoting their elimination. A daughter cell has three additional hurdles to overcome on its road to cancer. It must eliminate the threat of apoptosis; eliminate telomere degradation; and, prevent itself from ending up in an inhospitable environment away from resources. I. Stem cell (immortal) . a. Detach from neighbors . b. Escape from Immune Surveillance II. Daughter cell (specialized, mortal) . a. Detach from neighbors . b. Escape from Immune Surveillance . c. Prevent Apoptosis . d. Stop Degradation of the Telomere . e. Prev...

St. Peregrinus and CRF Theory

[ note: contains adult discussions of sexual matters which some non-biologists may find offensive ] St. Peregrinus is the patron saint of those suffering from cancer but his connection to this blog goes deeper than that, and it's something that I've been meaning to write about. if the CRF Theory demands a loss of communication between cells as the initiator of cancer, what role would physical factors play? I've refrained from discussing this because the evidence is very anecdotal. But let's start with the saint. In penance for his actions, he spent 30 years preferring standing to sitting, and he ended up with varicosities of the leg and, eventually, cancer of the foot which was so bad that an amputation was scheduled* The caveat that makes cancer etiology so difficult is that rarely does a single factor produce cancer for even when a single factor has a causal relationship, there are some who do not succumb to it. Multiple factors enter into the equation--the patien...