Skip to main content

Discovery may make it easier to develop life-saving stem cells


This article in ScienceBlog.com hints that we are getting closer to the illusive CRF's spoken about in this blog. Needless to say, I am very exciting about any work relating to reprogramming for I feel that two major problems could be solved by this: stem cell creation which the article mentions and which will be routine in transplantation medicine, and, not mentioned by the article but of equal importance, is the ability to reprogram cancer cells to a more innocuous phenotype or, at least, a non-invasive one.



This quote is from the article, "The researchers say that the genes ASF1A and OCT4 work in tandem with a ligand, a hormone-like substance that also is produced in the oocyte called GDF9, to facilitate the reprogramming process. 'We believe that ASF1A and GDF9 are two players among many others that remain to be discovered which are part of the cellular-reprogramming process,' Cibelli said."







This technique is more involved than the apparently discredited acid bath for iPSC creation that has been in the news of late, but I still believe that those researchers were onto something.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Biological Pathways Symbology

Post a Comment
Read more
Tumorigenesis: Actions to initiate the cancer state. The Cell Recognition Factor theory of cancer maintains that detachment of a cell from its neighbors is necessary for most cancers to arise. After that, a malfunction or replenishment of the telomere, or a reversion to stem cell, is necessary to permit the growth of cancer cells. The immune system then comes into play in keeping cancer cells in check or in promoting their elimination. A daughter cell has three additional hurdles to overcome on its road to cancer. It must eliminate the threat of apoptosis; eliminate telomere degradation; and, prevent itself from ending up in an inhospitable environment away from resources. I. Stem cell (immortal) . a. Detach from neighbors . b. Escape from Immune Surveillance II. Daughter cell (specialized, mortal) . a. Detach from neighbors . b. Escape from Immune Surveillance . c. Prevent Apoptosis . d. Stop Degradation of the Telomere . e. Prev...
1 comment
Read more

St. Peregrinus and CRF Theory

[ note: contains adult discussions of sexual matters which some non-biologists may find offensive ] St. Peregrinus is the patron saint of those suffering from cancer but his connection to this blog goes deeper than that, and it's something that I've been meaning to write about. if the CRF Theory demands a loss of communication between cells as the initiator of cancer, what role would physical factors play? I've refrained from discussing this because the evidence is very anecdotal. But let's start with the saint. In penance for his actions, he spent 30 years preferring standing to sitting, and he ended up with varicosities of the leg and, eventually, cancer of the foot which was so bad that an amputation was scheduled* The caveat that makes cancer etiology so difficult is that rarely does a single factor produce cancer for even when a single factor has a causal relationship, there are some who do not succumb to it. Multiple factors enter into the equation--the patien...
Post a Comment
Read more